Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2026
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Akhil Reddy Pashapu Sigridur Dalmannsdottir Marit Jørgensen Mallikarjuna Rao Kovi Odd Arne RognliSammendrag
Timothy is the most important perennial forage grass species in northern Norway, a region that is predicted to experience variable winter weather conditions due to climate change. Knowledge about how timothy cultivars respond to a changing climate is crucial for safeguarding forage production at higher latitudes. In the current study, we investigated changes in gene expression under freezing and ice encasement stresses and SNP allele frequencies between temporal populations (seed generations) of the two northern-adapted timothy cultivars Engmo and Noreng. In general, there was a decrease in freezing tolerance (defined as LT 50 , the temperature lethal to 50% of the population) and an increase in ice encasement tolerance (defined as LD 50 , the duration lethal to 50% of the population) over time. Comparative transcriptome analyses identified several genes known to be involved in stress responses, such as ethylene-responsive transcription factors, dehydration-responsive element binding transcription factors, reversion to ethylene sensitivity 1, and abscisic acid repressor 1, as differentially expressed between the temporal populations of Noreng under freezing stress. Several loci with large allele frequency changes were observed to be in close proximity to the genes displaying patterns resembling shifts over time in Noreng. Very few gene expression differences between populations of both cultivars under ice encasement stress could be due to weak selection pressure during seed multiplication. There was a gradual decline in genetic diversity in populations of both cultivars over time. The results indicate that phytohormone-mediated transcriptional regulation might be one of the key mechanisms for adaptation to changing winter weather conditions at higher latitudes. These findings underscore the importance of monitoring genetic shifts during seed multiplication to maintain cultivar stability and suggest that the identified stress-responsive genes could serve as valuable targets for breeding climate-resilient forage crops.
Forfattere
Edward Carbezas-Garcia Vibeke Lind Linus Kiprotich J. Gakige Chris S. Jones Claudia ArndtSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Shelemia Nyamuryekung'e Nolween Tulane Grete H. M. Jørgensen Vincent O'Flaherty Vibeke LindSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Farm animal welfare is assessed for compliance with legislation and labelling schemes, to evaluate the impacts of management change and for animal welfare research. Here, we ask: how can we assess how the animal experiences its life on farm? Animal welfare is what the animal experiences and spans from very negative to very positive emotional states. Welfare is influenced by nutrition, the environment, health and the behavioural interactions that animals have, integrated through the impacts that these have on the mental state of the animal. Whilst we can often readily measure and describe the conditions under which the animal is housed on farm (inputs), and the physical state of the animal within these conditions, these are not sufficient to tell us what the animal is experiencing. The Gold Standard for animal welfare, therefore, would be a measure that tells us something about the mental state of the animal. Currently, this is not considered a directly measurable entity, and it may remain a hypothetical rather than a realistic construct in welfare assessment. Thus, welfare assessment relies on a series of measurable outputs, or indicators, that serve as proxies for the welfare state. Emotional state and welfare are then inferred from these measures. Animal-based measures are considered the most relevant to understanding animal experience, although these require rigorous assessment of the validity and reliability of measurement. Many animal-based measures rely on the assessment of behaviour. These may be ongoing changes in response, such as approach or avoidance, facial expression, Qualitative Behaviour Assessment and circadian rhythms or complex patterns of behaviour, such as preferences, motivational priorities, or perceptions, which allow deeper insight into the likely mental state of the animal. Many measures are only suitable for research purposes at present and can be challenging to assess on farm, but some may be amenable to the use of sensors or automated methods in the future. These have technological and ethical challenges to overcome and require an understanding of what is being measured and how this relates to the animal’s mental state but may offer opportunities for continual assessment of animal behaviour and welfare in the future. Currently, however, theoretical understanding of animal welfare, particularly positive welfare and cumulative ‘Quality of Life’, is not well-captured in existing on−farm welfare assessment. We conclude that there is a need for a more comprehensive and integrated approach to the development of methods that can truly address the animal’s experience on farm.
Forfattere
Akhil Reddy Pashapu Sigridur Dalmannsdottir Marit Jørgensen Odd Arne Rognli Mallikarjuna Rao KoviSammendrag
The predicted increase in frequency and duration of winter warming episodes (WWEs) at higher northern latitudes is expected to negatively impact the forage production in this region. The formation of non-permeable ice cover due to WWEs creates hypoxic or anoxic conditions for plants, leading to severe winter damage. Knowledge about molecular mechanisms underlying various winter stresses, including ice encasement, is crucial to develop cultivars with better winter survival under changing climatic conditions. To date, very little is known about the molecular stress responses under ice encasement stress. To address this knowledge gap, in this study, we aimed to study ice encasement stress responses at the molecular level in the perennial forage grass timothy (Phleum pratense L.) by RNAseq. Genes encoding ethylene-responsive transcription factors, alcohol dehydrogenase 3, pyruvate decarboxylase 2, pyruvate kinase 1, dehydrins, early response to dehydration 15, glutathione reductase, and superoxide dismutase were highly upregulated under ice encasement conditions. KEGG enrichment analysis identified glycolysis, glutathione metabolism, and fructose and mannose metabolism as highly enriched among upregulated genes, whereas photosynthesis, flavonoid biosynthesis, motor proteins, and glycerolipid metabolism were highly enriched among downregulated genes. As initially hypothesized based on the nature of stress, the results indicate a substantial overlap of ice encasement stress responses with those of hypoxia and freezing stresses. Based on our findings and a comprehensive literature review on freezing and hypoxia stress responses, together with physiological studies of plants under ice encasement, we outline the potential mechanisms behind higher ice encasement tolerance in timothy.
Sammendrag
This study quantified field-scale nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal by crop harvests, balances, and use efficiencies in 14 grass fields in the Timebekken catchment. Measurements of grass yields, nutrient concentrations, manure composition, and soil properties across multiple fields and farms were combined with survey data. Results showed large variation across farms and fields in day matter yield, nutrient inputs, removals, balances, and use efficiencies. Annual dry matter yield ranged 6,830–12,800 kg ha-1 (mean 9,010 kg ha-1) in 2024 and 7,480–12,130 kg ha⁻¹ (mean 9,800 kg ha⁻¹) in 2025. In 2024, nutrient inputs as mineral fertilizers and manure ranged 169–362 kg N ha⁻¹ (mean 240 kg ha⁻¹) and 23–57 kg P ha⁻¹ (mean 40 kg ha⁻¹). Corresponding nutrient removal ranged 150–303 kg N ha⁻¹ (mean 220 kg ha⁻¹) and 22–40 kg P ha⁻¹ (mean 29 kg ha⁻¹). Nutrient balances ranged from −111 to +182 kg ha⁻¹ (+14 kg ha⁻¹) for N and from −14 to +35 kg ha⁻¹ (12 kg ha⁻¹) for P. Nutrient use efficiency (input∕removal) ranged 50%–166% (mean 100%) for N and 38%–160% (mean 80%) for P. Overall, results indicate consistent management within farms but clear differences between farms, and therefore substantial potential for improving fertilizer and manure precision while maintaining yields. Phosphorus yield exceeded 27 kg ha-1 in several fields, in some 35 kg ha-1, which are the maximal allowed fertilizer limits from 2033. This substantiates farmers’ concerns about these limits being too low, yet average P inputs still exceeded crop demand. Despite lower topsoil P-AL in 2023 than in 2005, soil P status remained high, likely sustaining yields under stricter P limits. Elevated subsoil P highlights long-term loss risks and the need for targeted mitigation measures in hotspot areas. The study also calls for more monitoring of manure nutrients, yields, and soil P properties.