Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2024
Abstract
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Authors
Belachew Asalf TadesseAbstract
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Abstract
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Editors
Lars Johan RustadAbstract
Totalkalkylen for jordbruket, som består av Totalkalkylen for jordbrukssektoren og Totalkalkylen for aktive jordbruksbedrifter, utarbeides årlig av Budsjettnemnda for jordbruket. Totalkalkylen viser totalverdiene som skapes i norsk jordbruk ved utnyttelse av jordbrukets produksjonsfaktorer. Seriene i Totalkalkylen for jordbrukssektoren går tilbake til 1959. På grunnlag av produksjonsinntekter, kostnader og budsjettoverføringer beregnes ulike resultatmål i jordbruket. Videre tallfestes antall jordbruksbedrifter, arbeidsforbruket, areal og avlinger, husdyrbestander og -ytelser.
Abstract
Rapporten tar for seg totalkapitalavkastning for kornbruk fra driftsgranskingene i perioden 1992 til 2022. Det har blitt gjort beregninger for kornbruk på Østlandets flatbygder og for kornbruk i hele landet. Resultatene viser at det var negativ totalkapitalavkastning i perioden, både for kornbruk på Østlandets flatbygder og for kornbruk i hele landet. Resultatene varierte fra år til år.
Authors
Jian Liu Faruk Djodjic Barbro Ulén Helena Aronsson Marianne Bechmann Lars Bergström Tore Krogstad Katarina KyllmarAbstract
Nordic agriculture faces big challenges to reduce phosphorus (P) loss from land to water for improving surface water quality. While understanding the processes controlling P loss and seeking for P mitigation measures, Norwegian and Swedish researchers have substantially benefited from and been inspired by Dr. Andrew Sharpley’s career-long, high-standard P research. Here, we demonstrate how Sharpley and his research have helped theNordic researchers to understand the role of cover crops in cold environmental conditions, best manure P management practices, and ditch processes. His work on critical source area (CSA) identification and site assessment tool development have also greatly inspired our thinking on the targeting of mitigation measures and the contextualizing tools for Nordic climate, landscape, and soils.While reflecting on Sharpley’s legacy, we identify several needs for Norwegian and Swedish P research and management. These include (1) tackling the challenges caused by local/regional unevenness in livestock density and related manure management and farm P surpluses, (2) identifying CSAs of P loss with high erosion risk and high P surplus, (3) obtaining more high-resolution mapping of soils with low P sorption capacity both in the topsoil and subsoil, (4) improving cross-scale understanding of processes and mitigation measures and proper follow-up of applied mitigation measures, and (5) increasing collaborations of researchers with farmers and farmers’ advisory groups and watershed groups by developing high-quality educational courses and extension materials. The needs should be addressed in the context of the challenges and opportunities created by climate change.
Authors
Albert Imsland Patrick Reynolds Lauri Teemu Kapari Simo Maduna Snorre Hagen Anna Hanssen Ólöf Dóra Bartels JónsdóttirAbstract
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Abstract
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Authors
Peter Maenhout Claudia Di Bene Maria Luz Cayuela Eugenio Diaz-Pines Anton Govednik Frida Keuper Sara Mavsar Rok Mihelic Adam O'Toole Ana Schwarzmann Marjetka Suhadolc Alina Syp Elena ValkamaAbstract
Soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in agricultural soils is an important tool for climate change mitigation within the EU soil strategy for 2030 and can be achieved via the adoption of soil management strategies (SMS). These strategies may induce synergistic effects by simultaneously reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and/or nitrogen (N) leaching. In contrast, other SMS may stimulate emissions of GHG such as nitrous oxide (N2O) or methane (CH4), offsetting the climate change mitigation gained via SOC sequestration. Despite the importance of understanding trade-offs and synergies for selecting sustainable SMS for European agriculture, knowledge on these effects remains limited. This review synthesizes existing knowledge, identifies knowledge gaps and provides research recommendations on trade-offs and synergies between SOC sequestration or SOC accrual, non-CO2 GHG emissions and N leaching related to selected SMS. We investigated 87 peer-reviewed articles that address SMS and categorized them under tillage management, cropping systems, water management and fertilization and organic matter (OM) inputs. SMS, such as conservation tillage, adapted crop rotations, adapted water management, OM inputs by cover crops (CC), organic amendments (OA) and biochar, contribute to increase SOC stocks and reduce N leaching. Adoption of leguminous CC or specific cropping systems and adapted water management tend to create trade-offs by stimulating N2O emissions, while specific cropping systems or application of biochar can mitigate N2O emissions. The effect of crop residues on N2O emissions depends strongly on their C/N ratio. Organic agriculture and agroforestry clearly mitigate CH4 emissions but the impact of other SMS requires additional study. More experimental research is needed to study the impact of both the pedoclimatic conditions and the long-term dynamics of trade-offs and synergies. Researchers should simultaneously assess the impact of (multiple) agricultural SMS on SOC stocks, GHG emissions and N leaching. This review provides guidance to policymakers as well as a framework to design field experiments and model simulations, which can address knowledge gaps and non-intentional effects of applying agricultural SMS meant to increase SOC sequestration.
Authors
Jose Climent Ricardo Alía Katri Karkkainen Catherine Bastien Marta Benito-Garzon Laurent Bouffier Giovanbattista De Dato Sylvain Delzon Arnaud Dowkiw Margarita Elvira-Recuenco Delphine Grivet Santiago C. González-Martínez Haleh Hayatgheibi Sonja Kujala Jean-Charles Leplé Ruth C. Martín-Sanz Marina de Miguel M. Cristina Monteverdi Sven Mutke Christophe Plomion José Alberto Ramírez-Valiente Leopoldo Sanchez Aida Solé-Medina Jean-Paul Soularue Arne Steffenrem Angela Teani Johan Westin Richard Whittet Harry Wu Rafael Zas Stephen CaversAbstract
Purpose of Review In this review, we synthesise current knowledge on trade-offs among traits in key fitness dimensions and identify major research gaps with the intention of laying the groundwork for a rapid advance in tree breeding for multiple objectives as a key contribution to the sustainability of planted forests in the future. Recent Findings Trade-offs among growth, reproduction, defence, stress tolerance and product quality predicted theoretically have been reported experimentally in many breeding programmes. Among these trade-offs, the genetic linkage between resistance against biotic threats and growth (or other relevant traits) is particularly critical for the current and future management of forest genetic resources. Maintaining tree growth and wood quality in the novel environments of the future requires the assessment of genetic correlations of target traits with phenology, closely linked to survival to temperature extremes. Improving our current knowledge on the genetic trade-offs of drought tolerance as a breeding objective in forest trees obligates a more precise definition of both the specific traits and the experimental conditions. Published evidence suggests that common target traits in breeding programmes may trade-off with reproductive success and fire-adaptation, and the simultaneous improvement of growth and wood quality traits still remains as a constraint in traditional tree breeding. Summary Changing environments combined with pests and diseases are challenging plantation forestry worldwide, which implies an urgent need to develop new improvement strategies to build the resilience of forestry for our future environments. It is essential to have a better understanding of how traits interact, especially those important for production, climate and biotic threat resilience, but much of the information is still missing. Since many key trade-offs are affected by the environment, we need new studies under novel environments to forecast levels of multi-trait integration in breeding populations.