Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2026
Sammendrag
En ny rapport viser at solbær inneholder flere interessante næringsstoffer – samtidig som strenge regler begrenser hva man kan si om helseeffekter.
Forfattere
Anna Birgitte MilfordSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Kathrin Yvonne Weber Erlend Grenager Sørmo Gerard Cornelissen Alice Budai Daniel Rasse Harald Bier Troy RobichaudSammendrag
Biochar has emerged as a promising carbon dioxide removal (CDR) solution that combines long-term carbon storage with benefits for soil health, waste management, and industrial applications. This report provides a comprehensive assessment of the current state of biochar across feedstocks, production technologies, material properties, and end-use pathways, with a particular focus on its role in climate mitigation. Drawing on scientific literature and international case studies, the report evaluates the carbon sequestration potential, environmental performance, and technological maturity of biochar systems. It distinguishes between applications that deliver durable carbon removal and those that primarily contribute to emission reductions. The report further examines deployment barriers, including feedstock availability, regulatory frameworks, market development, and safety considerations, and reviews the status of biochar implementation across Mission Innovation countries. Based on these insights, it outlines key opportunities and recommendations to support the responsible scale-up of biochar as a climate solution.
Forfattere
Colin Sinclair Jemma Louise Wadham Laura Jaakola Sabina Strmic PalinkasSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Linda Aune-LundbergSammendrag
Hvilke valg har vi tatt med bakgrunn i brukerinvolveringen?
Forfattere
Björn H. Franke Aafke M. Schipper Tal Avgar Luca Börger Nilanjan Chatterjee Thomas Müller Brian J. Smith Briana Abrahms Abdullahi H. Ali Nina Attias Hattie L. A. Bartlam‐Brooks Floris M. van Beest Jerrold L. Belant Dean E. Beyer Niels Blaum Michael B. Brown Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar Francesca Cagnacci Simon Chamaillé‐Jammes Nandintsetseg Dejid Jasja Dekker Arnaud L. J. Desbiez Julian Fennessy Christina Fischer Ilya Fischhoff Adam T. Ford Benedikt Gehr Jacob R. Goheen Ronaldo Gonçalves Morato Mark Hebblewhite Robert Hering Marco Heurich A. J. Mark Hewison Lynne A. Isbell Matthew Kauffman Andrew Jakes René Janssen Paul F. Jones Bob Jonge Poerink Clayton Lamb John Durrus Linnell A. Catherine Markham Courtney J. Marneweck Jenny Mattisson John McEvoy Erling Meisingset Evelyn Merrill Guilherme de Miranda Mourão Bram Van Moorter Nicolas Morellet Atle Mysterud John Odden Kirk A. Olson Agustín Paviolo Tyler Petroelje Kelly M. Proffitt Kasim Rafiq Nathan Ranc Christer Moe Rolandsen Daniel I. Rubenstein Sonia Saïd Hall Sawyer Niels Martin Schmidt Nuria Selva Agnieszka Sergiel Erling Johan Solberg Melissa Songer Jonas Stiegler Olav Strand Siva Sundaresan Jeffrey J. Thompson Wiebke Ullmann Dorj Usukhjargal Ulrich Voigt Filip Zięba Tomasz Zwijacz‐Kozica Mark A. J. Huijbregts Marlee A. TuckerSammendrag
Aim Animal movements are a fundamental process affecting communities and ecosystems. Quantifying habitat selection across species and habitats is key for understanding how animals respond to environmental change. Currently, we lack comparative studies that examine how habitat selection varies across species traits and landscapes. We aim to quantify global patterns of habitat selection to help understand the fundamental drivers of movement behaviour. Location Global. Time Period Contemporary. Major Taxa Studied Terrestrial mammals. Methods We estimated selection coefficients for terrain ruggedness, vegetation productivity, human population density and distance to roads of individual terrestrial mammals through step‐selection analysis of 1344 GPS tracks across 48 species. We quantified intra‐ and interspecific variation and tested whether selection coefficients were associated with species traits and habitat availability. Results We observe an overall avoidance of roads and areas of high human population density as well as rugged terrain, with a large proportion of individuals selecting for areas of intermediate NDVI. However, we also found large intraspecific variation in habitat selection and show that this variation is predicted by local and landscape‐level environmental conditions rather than species traits. Individuals in more remote areas exhibited weaker functional responses to human presence than those in more disturbed areas. Avoidance of rugged terrain is also context‐dependent, with stronger avoidance when local ruggedness is high. The only exception to the observed intraspecific variability is consistent species‐level responses to road proximity. Main Conclusions Our findings contribute to the understanding of habitat selection by terrestrial mammals, showing that selection is largely shaped by environmental conditions and that animals exhibit high plasticity in their responses. Our results also provide further evidence for the significant impact of roads on animal movement. These insights can help us to understand the potential effects of environmental change on the behaviour of mammal species around the world.
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Kathrin Yvonne Weber Erlend Grenager Sørmo Gerard Cornelissen Alice Budai Daniel Rasse Harald Bier Troy RobichaudSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
I rapporten synliggjøres egenskaper og verdier knyttet til de karbonrike arealene i Gjøvik kommune. Med karbonrike arealer menes arealer på skog, myr og jordbruksarealer på organisk jord. Kartene skal bidra til økt kunnskap om karbonrike arealer og deres påvirkning på klimatilpasning og arealplanlegging. Videre ble karbonrike arealer planlagt nedbygd kartlagt og rapporten summerer opp tiltak som kan gjøres for å redusere utslipp fra karbonrike arealer.
Forfattere
Adam Eindride Naas Trond Simensen Lasse Torben Keetz Ingrid Vesterdal Tjessem Anders Bryn Rune Halvorsen Peter Horvath Ida Marielle Mienna Olav Skarpaas Joachim Paul Töpper Vigdis Vandvik Liv Guri Velle Catharina Caspara VloonSammendrag
Field-based ecosystem maps are often used to support environmental impact assessments (EIAs) in later stages of spatial planning. During the early stages, however, information on geographical distributions of ecosystems is typically unavailable. This can result in uninformed decisions, with negative consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Although model-based maps offer low-cost wall-to-wall coverage, they are rarely used for spatial planning. Using Norway as a study system, we aimed to: (1) quantify the coverage of field-based ecosystem maps in areas reserved for development; (2) use a model-based map to assess ecosystem extents in these areas; and (3) provide guidance on how model-based maps can support spatial planning. We first collated municipality-level land-use plans and intersected these with existing field-based ecosystem maps created for EIAs. Then, we constructed a model-based map for 17 ecosystem types with a 10 m × 10 m resolution that was intersected with the unsurveyed land-use plans. We estimated that 4.2 km2 of land is reserved for development in an average municipality, of which 0.3 km2 is covered by field-based maps. Our model-based map indicates, with moderate uncertainty, that 260 km2 covered by red-listed ecosystem types is at risk of being affected if unsurveyed land reserves are developed. However, improvements in model training and uncertainty quantification methodology should be considered to increase utility of the maps. We provide guidelines for using model-based ecosystem maps in spatial planning, especially in early planning stages, aiming to support decision-making while taking the limitations of model-based maps into account.