Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2018
Sammendrag
Ealu biebman váttis doaibmadilálašvuođaid oktavuođas, dahje bargguid oktavuođas nu og čohkkedettiin ja jođidettiin.
Forfattere
Christian PedersenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the economic performance of Norwegian crop farms using a stochastic frontier analysis. Design/methodology/approach – The analysis was based on a translog cost function and unbalanced farm-level panel data for 1991–2013 from 455 Norwegian farms specialized in crop production in eastern and central regions of Norway. Findings – The results of the analysis show that the mean efficiency was about 78–81 percent. Farm management practices and socioeconomic factors were shown to significantly affect the economic performance of Norwegian crop farms. Research limitations/implications – Farmers are getting different types of support from the government and the study does not account for the different effects of different kinds of subsidy on cost efficiency. Different subsidies might have different effects on farm performance. To get more informative and useful results, it would be necessary to repeat the analysis with less aggregated data on subsidy payments. Practical implications – One implication for farmers (and their advisers) is that many of them are less efficient than the estimated benchmark (best performing farms). Thus, those lagging behind the best performing farms need to look at the way they are operating and to seek out ways to save costs or increase crop production. Perhaps there are things for lagging farmers to learn from their more productive farming neighbors. For instance, those farmers not practicing crop rotation might be well advised to try that practice. Social implications – For both taxpayers and consumers, one implication is that the contributions they pay that go to subsidize farmers appear to bring some benefits in terms of more efficient production that, in turn, increase the supply of some foods so possibly making food prices more affordable. Originality/value – Unlike previous performance studies in the literature, the authors estimated farm-level economic performance accounting for the contribution of both an important farm management practice and selected socioeconomic factors. Good farm management practices, captured through crop rotation, land tenure, government support and off-farm activities were found to have made a positive and statistically significant contribution to reducing the cost of production on crop-producing farms in the Central and Eastern regions of Norway.
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Kirsten TørresenSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Sebastian EiterSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Fernanda de Cássia Neves Esteca Luis Rodrigues Italo Delalibera Júnior Ingeborg Klingen Gilberto J. de MoraesSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Kjersti Holt HanssenSammendrag
The production of ash from wood has greatly increased the last years, because biofuels are increasingly being used for heating and energy production. The ash may either be viewed as a waste problem, or as a resource. Wood ash has a liming effect and contains essential nutrients (P, K, Ca, Mg) which can be exploited for soil fertilisation. With enhanced knowledge about where and how wood ash addition may increase forest growth - without having negative effects on the environment - wood ash may become a renewable nutrient source. We studied the effect of fertilizing a Norway spruce (Picea abies) stand on relatively high site index in SE Norway with ash, nitrogen, or ash + nitrogen. After five years, both current annual increment and standing volume was best in the ASH + N treatment and least in the Control plots. The field trial should be followed for a longer period of time, as the ASH + N treatment still shows an increasing growth trend after five years.
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag