Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2019
Sammendrag
We examine the origins, implications, and consequences of yield-based N fertilizer management. Yield-based algorithms have dominated N fertilizer management of corn (Zea mays) in the United States for almost 50 yr, and similar algorithms have been used all over the world to make fertilizer recommendations for other crops. Beginning in the mid-1990s, empirical research started to show that yield-based rules-of-thumb in general are not a useful guide to fertilizer management. Yet yield-based methods continue to be widely used, and are part of the principal algorithms of nearly all current “decision tool” software being sold to farmers for N management. We present details of the theoretical and empirical origins of yield-based management algorithms, which were introduced by George Stanford (1966, 1973) as a way to make N fertilizer management less reliant on data. We show that Stanford’s derivation of his “1.2 Rule” was based on very little data, questionable data omissions, and negligible and faulty statistical analysis. We argue that, nonetheless, researchers, outreach personnel, and private-sector crop management consultants were obliged to give some kind of N management guidance to farmers. Since data generation is costly, it is understandable that a broad, “ball park” rule-of-thumb was developed, loosely based on agronomic principles. We conclude by suggesting that technology changes now allow for exciting new possibilities in data-intensive fertilizer management research, which may lead to more efficient N management possibilities in the near future.
Sammendrag
The objective of this study was to make an overview assessment of the potential effects of intensified forest management, promoted by the Norwegian government as a climate mitigation measure, on water quality in Norwegian surface waters. This study evaluated the following measures for forest intensification: (i) afforestation, (ii) intensification of planting and (iii) nitrogen fertilization shortly before harvest. A substantial literature review was made and a further development of the DWARF- framework tailored for Norwegian conditions provided the base for the study. The assessments were made based on the potential effects after forest harvest, using different management strategies like stem-only harvest and whole-three harvest. The potential effects were analysed on multiple parameters with focus on acidification, eutrophication, heavy metals, and carbon sequestration. The study used temporal resolution to address what effects the forest management practices might lead to 1, 10 and 100 years after harvest. This study concludes that there will be trade-offs between transitioning to a low carbon society and water quality, and the severity of effects may differ if they are evaluated on an annual, decadal or century scale.
Forfattere
Anna Birgitte MilfordSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Live Lingaas Nesse Anne Marie Bakke Trine Eggen Kristian Hoel Magne Kaldhusdal Einar Ringø Siamak Pour Yazdankhah Erik-Jan Lock Rolf Erik Olsen Robin Ørnsrud Åshild KrogdahlSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Knut ØistadSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
May Bente BrurbergSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Arne Verstraeten Elena Gottardini Nicolas Bruffaerts Bruno De Vos Elena Vanguelova Fabiana Cristofolini Gerrit Genouw Anita Nussbaumer Mathias Neumann Sue Benham Pasi Rautio Liisa Ukonmaanaho Päivi Merilä Annika Saarto Jukka Reiniharju Peter Waldner Marijke Hendrickx Peter Roskams Nathalie Cools Johan Neirynck Arthur De Haeck Yvan De Bodt Geert Sioen Nicholas Clarke Volkmar Timmermann Karin Hansen Hans-Peter Dietrich Manuel Nicolas Maria Schmitt Anne Thimonier Katrin Meusburger Silvio Schüler Anna Kowalska Idalia Kasprzyk Katarzyna Borycka Łukasz Grewling Joanna Święta-Musznicka Małgorzata Latałowa Marcelina Zimny Małgorzata Malkiewicz Lars Vesterdal Iben Margrete Thomsen Miklós Manninger Donat Magyar Gergely Mányoki Hugues TiteuxSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
An annual sheep production system in Norway incorporates grazing natural pastures for five months. Yet no measurements of enteric methane emissions from grazing sheep have been performed under Norwegian conditions. A pilot study was conducted with 12 Norwegian White ewes to test the feasibility of using the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique under Norwegian conditions. The ewes were split onto one of two pastures, mixed grass (Bromus inermis dominated, Poa pratensis, Festuca pratensis) or white clover (Trifolium repens). After five days adaptation to pastures, breathe samples were collected into evacuated one L PVC canisters over three consecutive days where capillary tubes (0.38 to 0.42 mL/min initial flow) restricted flow. Gas samples were analysed by gas chromatography. Feed intakes were not recorded. Average live weights were 64 kg and 66 kg for ewes on grass and clover pastures, respectively. Methane emissions were 23.9 g/d from sheep on mixed grass and 28.2 g/d for sheep on white clover. Methane emissions were not correlated (p=0.33) to ewe live weight. One explanation for the 15% difference in methane emission could be differences in feed intake. The few days of sample collection could also explain some of the observed difference since the technique is recommended to be used over five days to reduce errors in observations. This pilot study shows that using the SF6-technique is a feasible method for future research. More experiments measuring enteric methane emission over a longer period from grazing sheep and cattle under Norwegian conditions are planned for the future.
Sammendrag
Biochar is a carbon-rich material that, due to its inherent resistance to decomposition, is primarily developed with the aim of sequestering carbon in soil. Despite the convincing benefits of biochar as a climate mitigation solution, it has not yet advanced much beyond the research stage, notably because its effect on yield are too modest. Therefore, there is a need for win-win biochar solutions benefiting both food production and climate mitigation. Such a solution is the development of biochar fertilizers, which capitalizes on the capacity of biochar to capture and release nutrients. This effect is largely attributed to the porous structure and large surface area of biochar, with surface charges and ash content also appearing to play a role. The nutrient-retaining capacity of biochar appears to vary among studies investigating different types of biochar exposed to different types of nutrients (mineral anions and cations, organic molecules) under different conditions. In the present study, we will report on a meta-analysis of published biochar properties that are associated with controlling the sorption of nutrients. As biochar properties largely depend on pyrolysis conditions and feedstock properties, this work contributes to the selective design of biochars for the purpose of improving nutrient use efficiency.