Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2013
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Fuad Gasi Mirsad Kurtovic Belma Kalamujic Naris Pojskic Jasmin Grahic Clive Kaiser Mekjell MelandSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Fuad Gasi Silvio Simon Naris Pojskic Mirsad Kurtovic Ivan Pejic Mekjell Meland Clive KaiserSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Mekjell MelandSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Mekjell MelandSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Crop load adjustments in European plum trees (Prunus domestica L.) require thinning either by hand (mechanical) or chemical means to achieve marketable size, fruit quality and to overcome alternate bearing. Efficient tools for crop load management are highly desirable, since only a few chemical thinners are registered and hand thinning is labor intensive and costly. Gibberellic acid (GA3) was tested as a novel approach to regulate the crop load of the plum cultivar ‛Opal’ at Ullensvang, western Norway. The objective was to reduce flower bud induction in the “off-year” thus adjusting crop load the subsequent year. In 2008, an “off-year”, GA3 was applied to 9 year-old ‘Opal’ trees as a high volume spray to the point of run-off at 50 ppm or 100 ppm at either 5 weeks after full bloom or 10 weeks after full bloom, or on both dates and compared with untreated control trees. Trees were unthinned the first year but then thinned to commercial standard the following year. In the year of application, total yield was recorded and fruit quality evaluated. Return bloom, fruit set, yield and fruit quality were assessed the subsequent year. In general, there were no significant differences in crop load of all treated trees compared to untreated trees in the year of application (non-target crop) however, fruit weight increased slightly on those trees when GA3 was applied 5 weeks after full bloom compared to all other treatments and untreated trees. The following year (target crop) fruit set was significantly reduced for all GA3 treatments. The most effective application time was 5 weeks after full bloom. Before thinning, initial fruit set was greatest on untreated trees as well as on those trees treated with GA3 10 weeks after full bloom. Fruit weight and fruit colour were significantly better on trees with the least fruit set. GA3 applications had no effect on fruit firmness. It is concluded that GA3 is an effective tool for inhibiting flower bud induction in an “off-year” thus enabling crop load management the subsequent “on-year”.