Publikasjoner
NIBIOs ansatte publiserer flere hundre vitenskapelige artikler og forskningsrapporter hvert år. Her finner du referanser og lenker til publikasjoner og andre forsknings- og formidlingsaktiviteter. Samlingen oppdateres løpende med både nytt og historisk materiale. For mer informasjon om NIBIOs publikasjoner, besøk NIBIOs bibliotek.
2016
Forfattere
Sander Jacobs Nicolas Dendoncker Berta Martín-López David Nicholas Barton Erik Gomez-Baggethun Fanny Boeraeve Francesca L. McGrath Kati Vierikko Davide Geneletti Katharina J. Sevecke Nathalie Pipart Eeva Primmer Peter Mederly Stefan Schmidt Alexandra Aragão Himlal Baral Rosalind H. Bark Tania Briceno Delphine Brogna Pedro Cabral Rik De Vreese Camino Liquete Hannah Mueller Kelvin S.-H. Peh Anna Phelan Alexander R. Rincón Shannon H. Rogers Francis Turkelboom Wouter Van Reeth Boris T. van Zanten Hilde Karine Wam Carla-Leanne WashbournSammendrag
We are increasingly confronted with severe social and economic impacts of environmental degradation all over the world. From a valuation perspective, environmental problems and conflicts originate from trade-offs between values. The urgency and importance to integrate nature's diverse values in decisions and actions stand out more than ever. Valuation, in its broad sense of ‘assigning importance’, is inherently part of most decisions on natural resource and land use. Scholars from different traditions -while moving from heuristic interdisciplinary debate to applied transdisciplinary science- now acknowledge the need for combining multiple disciplines and methods to represent the diverse set of values of nature. This growing group of scientists and practitioners share the ambition to explore how combinations of ecological, socio-cultural and economic valuation tools can support real-life resource and land use decision-making. The current sustainability challenges and the ineffectiveness of single-value approaches to offer relief demonstrate that continuing along a single path is no option. We advocate for the adherence of a plural valuation culture and its establishment as a common practice, by contesting and complementing ineffective and discriminatory single-value approaches. In policy and decision contexts with a willingness to improve sustainability, integrated valuation approaches can be blended in existing processes, whereas in contexts of power asymmetries or environmental conflicts, integrated valuation can promote the inclusion of diverse values through action research and support the struggle for social and environmental justice. The special issue and this editorial synthesis paper bring together lessons from pioneer case studies and research papers, synthesizing main challenges and setting out priorities for the years to come for the field of integrated valuation.
Forfattere
Annika M. Felton Adam Felton Joris P. G. M. Cromsigt Lars Edenius Jonas Malmsten Hilde Karine WamSammendrag
People provide wild ungulates with large quantities of supplementary feed to improve their health and survival and reduce forest damage. Whereas supplementary feeding can positively affect the winter survival of ungulates and short-term hunting success, some of the feeds provided may actually reduce ungulate health and increase forest damage. Here, we highlight how recent advances in ungulate nutritional ecology can help explain why supplementary feeding can lead to undesirable outcomes. Using Europe’s largest cervid, the moose (Alces alces), as a model species, and Sweden, as the socio-ecological context, we explain the concept of nutritional balancing and its relevance to supplementary feeding. Nutritional balancing refers to how animals alter their food intake to achieve a specific nutritional target balance in their diet, by selecting balanced food items or by combining items with nutritional compositions that are complimentary. As the most common supplementary feeds used contain higher concentrations of non-structural carbohydrates than the ungulates’ normal winter diet, the consumption of such feeds may cause animals to increase their intake of woody browse, and thereby exacerbate forest damage. We also explain how animal health may be negatively affected by large intakes of such feed if complementary browse items are not available. We therefore suggest that the use of inappropriate feed is an additional means by which supplementary feeding may result in negative outcomes for hunters, forest owners, and wild animals.
Forfattere
Lise GrøvaSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Lise GrøvaSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Lise GrøvaSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Lise GrøvaSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Sammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Lise GrøvaSammendrag
Det er ikke registrert sammendrag
Forfattere
Lise GrøvaSammendrag
Presentasjon av KRUS-prosjektet på NIBIO samling.