Publications
NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.
2020
Authors
Cornelya KlutschAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Cornelya KlutschAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Cornelya KlutschAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Carmen Morales-Rodriguez Sten Anslan Marie-Anne Auger-Rozenberg S. Augustin Yuri N. Baranchikov Amani Bellahirech Daiva Burokiene Dovilė Čepukoit Ejup Çota K Davydenko H.T. Doğmuş-Lehtijärvi R. Drenkhan T. Drenkhan Rene Eschen I. Franić M. Glavendekić MB De Groot Magdalena Kacprzyk Marc Kenis Natalia Kirichenko I. Matsiakh DL Musolin Justyna A. Nowakowska Richard O’Hanlon S. Prospero A Roques A Santini Venche Talgø Leho Tedersoo A Uimari A. Vannini J Witzell S Woodward Antonios Zambounis Michelle ClearyAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
D. Vanella D.S. Intrigliolo S. Consoli G. Longo-Minnolo G. Lizzio R.C. Dumitrache E. Mateescu Johannes Deelstra J.M. Ramírez-CuestaAbstract
The reliability of short-term weather forecast provided by COSMO model in simulating reference evapotranspiration (ET0) was evaluated in 7 study sites distributed in 4 countries (Italy, Norway, Romania and Spain). The main objective of the study was to assess the optimal scenario for calculating ET0, using the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (PM) equation, by separately considering the accuracy in the use of “past” and “forecast” data input. Firstly, each forecasted variable (air temperature, Tair; relative humidity, RH; wind speed, u2; solar radiation, Rs) and ET0 were compared with in situ observations at hourly and daily scales. Moreover the seasonality effect in the forecast performance was evaluated. Secondly, simulated ET0 were computed every three days with: (i) a “past scenario” that used the observed data input measured in situ during the previous three days, (ii) a “forecast scenario” that used the forecasted input variables for the next three days; and compared with (iii) actual ET0 obtained from the in situ measured data. A general good agreement was found between observed and forecasted agro-meteorological parameters at the different explored time-scales. The best performance was obtained for Tair and Rs, followed by RH and u2. Globally, the comparison between ET0 from the measured and forecasted data input showed high performance, with R2 and RMSE of 0.90 and 0.68 mm d−1. ET0 simulations resulted more accurate using the “forecast scenario” (1.7% overestimation), rather than using the “past scenario” (2.6% underestimation). These results open promising perspectives in the use of forecast for ET0 assessment for different agriculture practices and particularly for irrigation scheduling under water scarcity conditions.
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Emil Engelund Thybring Ramūnas Digaitis Thomas Nord-Larsen Greeley Beck Maria FredrikssonAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Radosav Cerovic Milica Fotiric Akšic Milena Dordevic Mekjell MelandAbstract
No abstract has been registered