Fride Høistad Schei
Research Scientist
Biography
I am a community ecologist broadly interested in how natural and human global change drivers affect populations, communities and ecosystems at different spatial and temporal scales. Currently, I am focusing on forest ecology, conservation, and sustainable management of forest resources.
Keywords: Conservation, continuous cover forestry (CCF), forest ecology, forest certification and long-term changes.
Authors
Kai Yue Pieter Vangansbeke Isla H. Myers-Smith Donald M. Waller Kris Verheyen Markus Bernhardt-Römermann Lander Baeten Ingmar R. Staude Anne D. Bjorkman Radim Hédl Christopher Andrews Elena Barni Thomas Becker Antoine Becker-Scarpitta José Luis Benito-Alonso Jonathan Bennie Imre Berki Volker Blüml Jörg Brunet James M. Bullock Hans Van Calster Michele Carbognani Markéta Chudomelová Déborah Closset-Kopp Pavel Dan Turtureanu Gergana N. Daskalova Guillaume Decocq Jan Dick Martin Diekmann Thomas Dirnböck Tomasz Durak Ove Eriksson Brigitta Erschbamer Bente Jessen Graae Thilo Heinken Martin Hermy Peter Horchler Ute Jandt Bogdan Jaroszewicz Róbert Kanka Jozef Kollár Martin Kopecký Thomas Kudernatsch Andrea Lamprecht Jonathan Lenoir Martin Macek Marek Malicki František Máliš Ottar Michelsen Fraser Mitchell Tobias Naaf Thomas A. Nagel Miles Newman Adrian C. Newton Lena Nicklas Ludovica Oddi Anna Orczewska Simone Orsenigo Adrienne Ortmann-Ajkai Jan den Ouden Harald Pauli George Peterken Petr Petřík Remigiusz Pielech Mihai Puşcaş Christophe Randin Kamila Reczyńska Christian Rixen Fride Høistad Schei Wolfgang Schmidt Jan Šebesta Alina Stachurska-Swakon Tibor Standovár Krzysztof Świerkosz Balázs Teleki Jean Paul Theurillat Tudor Mihai Ursu Thomas Vanneste Mark Vellend Philippine Vergeer Ondřej Vild Luis Villar Pascal Vittoz Manuela Winkler Sonja Wipf Fuzhong Wu Shengmin Zhang Pieter De FrenneAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Fride Høistad ScheiAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Matti Koivula Adam Felton Mari Jönsson Therese Löfroth Fride Høistad Schei Juha Siitonen Jörgen SjögrenAbstract
• This chapter summarises biodiversity responses to continuous cover forestry (CCF). The comparator throughout this chapter is rotation forestry (RF) and its main harvesting method—clearcutting—unless otherwise stated. • Research on the biodiversity effects of logging methods applied in CCF (mostly selection or gap cutting) mainly concerns the short-term effects of measures taken in mature, originally fairly even-aged forests, at best 10–15 years after cutting. Thus far, no surveys or chronosequences cover the whole rotation period (60–100 years). • Continuous cover forestry is likely to beneft species that suffer when the tree cover is removed, such as bilberry and its associated species. Species requiring spatial continuity in host trees or canopy cover may also benefit. • Selection cutting may preserve the majority of species in the mature forest, but the most sensitive species may decline or even disappear. Gap cutting (diameter 20–50 m) affects forest-interior species relatively little, but species’ abundances in gaps change with increasing gap size. Shelterwood cutting seems to closely resemble selection cutting in terms of species responses. In the long term, however, shelterwood cutting results in an even-aged and sparse overstorey, which does not produce the biodiversity benefits of CCF. • Species that have declined due to forestry mostly require large living and dead trees. The preservation of these species is not ensured by CCF alone, but requires deliberately maintaining these structural features. • A mosaic of different forest-management practices within landscapes may provide complementary ways to maintain rich biodiversity.
