Publications
NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.
2024
Authors
Xabier Díaz de Otálora Agustín del Prado Federico Dragoni Lorraine Balaine Guillermo Pardo Wilfried Winiwarter Anna Sandrucci Giorgio Ragaglini Tina Kabelitz Marek Kieronczyk Grete H. M. Jørgensen Fernando Estellés Barbara AmonAbstract
No abstract has been registered
2023
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Narta ElshaniAbstract
Sheep production systems in Norway present complexity in the same way as other systems partaking in the climate challenges. Sustainability of these systems cannot be defined through single-impact indicators; hence a broader range of sustainability dimensions and trade-offs must be assessed. The present research uses the Sustainability Assessment and Monitoring RouTine (SMART): a multi-criteria sustainability assessment based on the Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture Systems (SAFA) Guidelines which gathers data on the farms’ performance through 327 indicators across 4 dimensions. Eight sheep farms in Norway were selected for assessment: four low-land coastal farms, and four inland mountain farms. Management practices which support sustainability were identified in all farms: high animal welfare, high number of days of access to pasture for the livestock, no/low use of synthetic chemicals, good water management, and high quality of life for farmers. Management practices which hinder sustainability and key areas for improvement were also identified: increased on-farm energy production, decreased use of externally sourced concentrate feed, and increased farmers’ knowledge about externally sourced inputs. Some differences between the coastal and inland farms were also identified which were related to number of days of access to pasture for livestock, water consumption, participation for farmers in trainings and additional education, and political involvement. Using the SMART-Farm tool aided the process of identifying practices and systematically evaluating them through a global sustainability perspective.Aggregated results from the SMART-Farm assessment indicated a high degree of goal achievement across dimensions. The farms scored on average above 80% on the Environmental Integrity and the Social Well-Being, and lower on the Economic Resilience and the Good Governance dimensions (76% & 71% respectively). To evaluate these results, a qualitative expert elicitation method was employed; this provided insight into shortcomings which were a result of the context-generic approach that the tool has and lack of inclusion of stakeholder participation in indicator selection and aggregation process. These shortcomings are important to consider when interpreting the results of numeral integration assessments which are used for decision-making. However, evaluating these scores was also a valuable outcome in itself since it uncovered knowledge gaps about the topic of sustainability of sheep farming in Norway.
Abstract
Cover crops are used to increase carbon sequestration in soils. However, an increase of organic matter in soils not only increases carbon stocks but also affects nitrogen availability. This can trigger N2O emissions, particularly during wintertime, when standing plant biomass from cover crops decays. N2O emissions associated with cover crops could potentially cancel out the carbon gain. In this study, N2O emissions were measured over two years in a field experiment in SE Norway with barley and various cover crops (perennial and Italian ryegrass, oilseed radish, summer and winter vetch, phacelia and a mixture of different herbs) and compared with controls without cover crops. Manual chambers were used in summer during the growth of the main crop, while winter emissions were measured more frequently by a field robot to capture freeze-thaw induced emission peaks. Both winters had poor snow cover and the highest N2O emissions were measured during freeze-thaw cycles in early spring. Nitrogen-rich cover crops with poor overwintering (oilseed radish) increased wintertime emissions, whereas perennial cover crops with good overwintering (perennial ryegrass and herb mixture) tended to reduce N2O emissions compared to controls. This suggests that the overall climate effect of cover crops in hemiboreal cereal production depends on cover crop species and winter conditions.
Abstract
The use of cover crops in cereal production as a climate smart agricultural practice is generally used to increase carbon sequestration in soils. However, increased plant biomass in wintertime can trigger N2O emissions due to decay during freeze-thaw cycles. So far little is known about N2O winter emissions from cover crops which, in the worst case, could cancel out the carbon gain by cover crops. Here we report N2O emissions from a two-year field experiment in SE Norway with barley and various cover crops (perennial and Italian ryegrass, oilseed radish, summer and winter vetch, phacelia and a mixture of different herbs) measured against controls without cover crops. A field robot was used for measuring N2O emissions at high temporal resolution during off-season, i.e., the period from cereal crop harvest to cereal crop sowing. During the first winter, the snow cover was poor and the significantly higher N2O emissions were measured from oilseed radish during spring thaw whereas perennial ryegrass reduced emissions. A second winter is measured and N2O emissions from both years will be presented. In addition, continuous measurements are needed to assess the effect of diurnal freeze-thaw cycles on N2O emissions before scaling up to annual N2O emission fluxes and comparing with C sequestration.
Authors
J. O’Malley J.A. Finn C.S. Malisch P.R. Adler M. Bezemer A. Black Åshild Gunilla Ergon J. Eriksen S. Filley A. Fiorini P. Golinski G. Grange J. Hakl Y. He N. Hoekstra P. Högy O. Huguenin-Elie M. Ibanez R. Jiaxin J. Jing J. Jungers Z. Kadžiulienė D. Krol J Lajeunesse G. Louarn S. Meyer T. Moloney G. Peratoner C. Porqueddu C. Reynolds Ievina Sturite M.N. Thivierge F. Zhu C. BrophyAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Claire Morgan-Davies Germain Tesniere Cathy Dwyer Grete H. M. Jørgensen Eliel Gonzalez-Garcia Sotiris Patsios Evangeline Sossidou Tim Keady Brid McClearn Fiona Kenyon Gerrardo Caja Lise Grøva Mauro Decandia Ludovic Cziszter Ilan Halachmi Jean Marc GautierAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Ingerd Skow Hofgaard Guro Brodal Heidi Udnes Aamot Marit Almvik Aina Lundon Russenes Morten Lillemo Simon Graham EdwardsAbstract
Oat harvested from plants infested with plant pathogenic fungi within the Fusarium head blight (FHB) complex may sometimes contain high levels of mycotoxins, which makes the grain unsuitable for food and feed. Fusarium graminearum, a deoxynivalenol (DON) producer, and Fusarium langsethiae, a T-2 toxin (T2) and HT-2 toxin (HT2) producer, are commonly occurring in Norwegian oats. We have analysed grains of Nordic oat varieties and breeding lines for the content of mycotoxins and DNA of Fusarium species belonging to the FHB disease complex (Hofgaard et al. 2022). The grains were harvested from field trials located in South-East Norway in the years 2011-2020. The ranking of oat varieties according to HT2+T2 levels corresponded with the ranking according to the DNA levels of F. langsethiae. However, this ranking did not resemble the ranking for DON and F. graminearum DNA. Our results implies that a moderate resistance to DON producers does not guarantee a moderate resistance to HT2+T2 producers. Separate tests are therefore necessary to determine the resistance towards DON and HT2+T2 producers in oats. This creates practical challenges for the screening of FHB resistance in oats as todays’ screening focuses on resistance to F. graminearum and DON. We identified oat varieties with generally low levels of both mycotoxins and FHB pathogens which should be promoted to mitigate mycotoxin risk in Norwegian oats.
Abstract
No abstract has been registered