Hopp til hovedinnholdet

Publications

NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.

2025

To document

Abstract

In 2009, the European Parliament and Council adopted the Directive 2009/128/EC (European Communities) for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides. According to this situation, the integrated pest management (IPM)-Project Golf 2020–2023 was implemented by Scandinavian Turfgrass and Environment Research Foundation and the R&A Trust Company (No. 1) Limited (the R&A) to evaluate and assess new techniques and alternative products to control diseases such as microdochium patch (Microdochium nivale) and dollar spot (Clarireedia spp.) with the goal to reduce the use of fungicides. As a sub-project, the use of UV-C radiation was carried out to investigate the effectivity of UV-C radiation to prevent both diseases on golf course putting greens. This study was conducted from spring 2020 until spring 2022 on a putting green (50% Poa spp. and 50% Agrostis spp.) at the golf course of Osnabrück Golf Club (Germany). The dosages of UV-C radiation were 0 mJ/cm2, 7–8 mJ/cm2, 35–40 mJ/cm2, and 70–80 mJ/cm2 which were applied using the SGL UV-C 180 just prior to and during periods of active dollar spot and microdochium patch development. The results of the UV-C application determined that highest UV-C dosage was able to reduce the severity of dollar spot and microdochium patch by 46%–81%. Thus, UV-C radiation with enhanced dosages can be a helpful tool in IPM strategies for turfgrass management to reduce chemical fungicides with view on tolerance levels of disease infestation.

To document

Abstract

Biobanking (also known as germplasm banking) of genetic material is a well-established concept for preserving plant genetic diversity and also contributes to food security, conservation and restoration. Macroalgae currently represent a very small percentage of the strains in publicly accessible European germplasm banks, despite the increasing recognition of their contribution to achieving several of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. There is no strategic coordination of existing macroalgal strains, which could have severe ecological and economic implications as species and their genetic diversity disappear rapidly due to local and global environmental stressors. In this opinion paper, we stress the importance of a coordinated European effort for preserving macroalgal genetic diversity and suggest the development of a three-pillared system to safeguard European macroalgal genetic material consisting of (1) a European Board of Macroalgal Genetic Resources (EBMGR) to provide supervision, support and coordination, (2) a network of germplasm banks consisting of currently existing and newly established infrastructures and (3) an interoperable databank integrating existing databanks. While it will be the task of the EBMGR to identify and coordinate priorities, we offer initial recommendations for preserving macroalgal genetic material, discuss the risks of inaction, and highlight the challenges that must be overcome. Highlights • A coordinated European effort is crucial to preserve macroalgal genetic diversity, addressing rapid species and genetic loss due to environmental stressors. • The initiative should include a European Board of Macroalgal Genetic Resources for oversight, a network of existing and new germplasm banks and an interoperable databank integrating current resources. • The effort supports the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

To document

Abstract

Today, at the international level, powerful data portals are available to biodiversity researchers and policymakers, offering increasingly robust computing and network capacities and capable data services for internationally agreed-on standards. These accelerate individual and complex workflows to map data-driven research processes or even to make them possible for the first time. At the national level, however, and alongside these international developments, national infrastructures are needed to take on tasks that cannot be easily funded or addressed internationally. To avoid gaps, as well as redundancies in the research landscape, national tasks and responsibilities must be clearly defined to align efforts with core priorities. In the present article, we outline 10 essential functions of national biodiversity data infrastructures. They serve as key providers, facilitators, mediators, and platforms for effective biodiversity data management, integration, and analysis that require national efforts to foster biodiversity science, policy, and practice.