Jorunn Børve
Research Scientist
(+47) 958 78 057
jorunn.borve@nibio.no
Place
Ullensvang
Visiting address
NIBIO Ullensvang, NO-5781 Lofthus
Biography
My main research topic is plant pathology related to fruit growing. My researcher carrier started with a PhD about fungal fruit decay in sweet cherries. Later on it has been a wider focus with fruit rot on apple, plum and sweet cherry fruits in addition to important diseases on the trees such as European canker and bacterial canker. The research is done in cooperation with the fruit industry and related industries such as packinghouses and nurseries.
Abstract
The positive effects of the commonly used commercial treatments of 1-MCP and CA storage on apple are well known and implemented for a range of cultivars in many countries. However, as both technologies demand investments and require additional annual user costs, the decision of implementation must be taken based on the predicted benefit obtained in the specific conditions. The main cultivar in volume in Norway, ‘Red Aroma’, commonly has a main sale period from about two to maximum eight weeks after harvest, in part due to market preferences. However, without additional treatments, the cultivar is often unmarketable after eight weeks due to a combination of firmness loss regardless of storage temperature and soft scald development, with further impacts of variation in ripening at harvest and decay development during storage. Possible improvement in shelf-life quality of fruit stored for about eight to 10 weeks either in CA, or in combination with 1-MCP, were explored through a holistic perspective in industrial scale experiments. Differences in effects of the treatments on multiple commercial deliveries, between seasons, packinghouses, and varying fruit sizes were found. Possible reasons for these differences as well as opportunities for improvements at the packinghouse level will be discussed.
Authors
Jorunn Børve Theresa Weigl Emily Follett Ingunn Øvsthus H. Larsen Torbjørn Haukås E. Indergård S.F. Remberg Dalphy Ondine Camira Harteveld Arne StensvandAbstract
Evaluating the effect of different treatments after a simulated shelf life is common in postharvest industry experiments. As fungal fruit decay development is closely linked to preharvest factors, fruit quality, and postharvest treatments two other time points were added in recent experiments. When commercial packinghouses graded the different experimental units (from 1 to 4 bins) they made three different samples; 1) all the fruit manually discarded before size grading (mostly external symptoms of fungal fruit decay and physiological disorders), 2) a 100-fruit sample of the fruit not regarded as first class by the grading machine at size grading (fruit that could be used for industry purpose, processing fruit), and 3) packed fruit for shelf life testing. As expected, differences in pathogen presence were found varying with storage time, cultivar, season, treatments, etc., but overall, some important factors could be pointed at: up to 70% of the processing fruit had damages (caused by insects, weather or mechanical damage) that could be an entry point of fungal pathogens in storage. Apple scab was found on up to 60% of that fruit and up to 12% of the graded fruit in shelf-life tests, indicating a less effective fungicide strategy in some of the commercial orchards. The additional knowledge gained by having three sample types in the experiments is discussed.
Authors
Wiktoria Kaczmarek-Derda Trygve S. Aamlid Ingerd Skow Hofgaard Tatsiana Espevig Khaled Murad Agha Anette Sundbye Zahra Bitarafan Kirsten Tørresen Heidi Udnes Aamot Andrea Ficke Gunda Thöming Annette Folkedal Schjøll Håvard Eikemo Anne Muola Therese With Berge Belachew Asalf Tadesse Jorunn Børve Arne Stensvand Nina Trandem Gunnhild Jaastad Bjørn Arild Hatteland Katherine Ann Gredvig Nielsen Nina Johansen Charles Kwadha Inger Sundheim Fløistad Martin Pettersson Zhibo Hamborg Carl Jonas Jorge Spetz Dag-Ragnar Blystad Özgün Candan Onarman Umu Marit Skuterud Vennatrø Jan Philip Øyen Solveig Haukeland Tor-Einar Skog Roger Holten Anne Straumfors Valborg Kvakkestad Line Ulberg Tveiten Ingrid FlatlandAbstract
I Jordbruksoppgjøret 2025 (Prp. 149 S (2024 – 2025)) ble det enighet om at kunnskapsstatus og -behov innen plantehelseområdet fra 2019 måtte oppdateres. Det er gjort i form av denne rapporten. Den bestilte utredningen er avgrenset til skadegjørere og planteverntiltak som er relevante for jord- og hagebruk. Utredingen tar for seg kunnskap, prosjekter og kunnskapshull siden 2019 og fram til i dag (2026). Kapittel 1 omtaler metodebruk og plantevern i et beredskapsperspektiv. Kapittel 2.1-2.8 omhandler status for utfordringer med skadegjørere og tilgang til planteverntiltak for alle aktuelle plantekulturer for ugras, skadedyr og sopp. Kapittel 2.9 gir en oversikt over godkjente og utgåtte plantevernmidler siden 2019. Kapittel 2.10 omhandler skadegjørere hvor kjemiske plantevernmidler er i begrenset bruk. Det vil si virus, bakterier og nematoder. Kapittel 3 tar for seg ny teknologi og innovative metoder for integrert plantevern og faktorer som påvirker bruken av disse. Kapittel 4 omhandler miljø- og helseeffekter knyttet til bruk av kjemiske plantevernmidler, hvilke plantekulturer som utgjør størst risiko for negative miljøeffekter og faktorer som reduserer helserisikoen. Kapittel 5 tar for seg næringens behov og utviklingstrekk knyttet til kunnskap, rådgivning og tiltak. Dette kapittelet ser også på årsaker til eventuelle endringer i bruk av og behov for plantevernmidler som følge av for eksempel miljøkrav.