Publications
NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.
2023
Authors
Jennifer James Chedly Kastally Katharina B. Budde Santiago C. González-Martínez Pascal Milesi Tanja Pyhäjärvi Martin Lascoux Paraskevi Alizoti Ricardo Alía Olivier Ambrosio Filippos A Aravanopoulos Georg Von Arx Albet Audrey Francisco Auñón Camilla Avanzi Evangelia Avramidou Francesca Bagnoli Marko Bajc Eduardo Ballesteros Evangelos Barbas José M García Del Barrio Cristina C Bastias Catherine Bastien Giorgia Beffa Raquel Benavides Vanina Benoit Frédéric Bernier Henri Bignalet Guillaume Bodineau Damien Bouic Sabine Brodbeck William Brunetto Jurata Buchovska Corinne Buret Melanie Buy Ana M Cabanillas-Saldaña Bárbara Carvalho Stephen Cavers Fernando Del Caño Sandra Cervantes Nicolas Cheval José M Climent Marianne Correard Eva Cremer Darius Danusevičius Benjamin Dauphin Jean-Luc Denou Bernard Dokhelar Alexis Ducousso Bruno Fady Patricia Faivre-Rampant Anna-Maria Farsakoglou Patrick Fonti Ioannis Ganopoulos Olivier Gilg Nicolas De Girardi René Graf Alan Gray Delphine Grivet Felix Gugerli Christoph Hartleitner Katrin Heer Enja Hollenbach Agathe Hurel Bernard Issenhuth Florence Jean Véronique Jorge Arnaud Jouineau Jan-Philipp Kappner Robert Kesälahti Florian Knutzen Sonja T Kujala Timo A Kumpula Katri Kärkkäinen Mariaceleste Labriola Celine Lalanne Johannes Lambertz Gregoire Le-Provost Vincent Lejeune Isabelle Lesur-Kupin Joseph Levillain Mirko Liesebach David López-Quiroga Ermioni Malliarou Jérémy Marchon Nicolas Mariotte Antonio Mas Silvia Matesanz Benjamin Meier Helge Meischner Célia Michotey Sandro Morganti Tor Myking Daniel Nievergelt Anne Eskild Nilsen Eduardo Notivol Dario Isidro Ojeda Alayon Sanna Olsson Lars Opgenoorth Geir Østreng Birte Pakull Annika Perry Sara Pinosio Andrea Piotti Christophe Plomion Nicolas Poinot Mehdi Pringarbe Luc Puzos Annie Raffin José A Ramírez-Valiente Christian Rellstab Dourthe Remi Oliver Reutimann Sebastian Richter Juan J Robledo-Arnuncio Odile Rogier Elisabet Martínez Sancho Outi Savolainen Simone Scalabrin Volker Schneck Silvio Schueler Ivan Scotti Sergio San Segundo Vladimir Semerikov Lenka Slámová Ilaria Spanu Jørn Henrik Sønstebø Jean Thevenet Mari Mette Tollefsrud Norbert Turion Fernando Valladares Giovanni G. Vendramin Marc Villar Marjana Westergren Johan WestinAbstract
New mutations provide the raw material for evolution and adaptation. The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) describes the spectrum of effects of new mutations that can occur along a genome, and is, therefore, of vital interest in evolutionary biology. Recent work has uncovered striking similarities in the DFE between closely related species, prompting us to ask whether there is variation in the DFE among populations of the same species, or among species with different degrees of divergence, that is whether there is variation in the DFE at different levels of evolution. Using exome capture data from six tree species sampled across Europe we characterized the DFE for multiple species, and for each species, multiple populations, and investigated the factors potentially influencing the DFE, such as demography, population divergence, and genetic background. We find statistical support for the presence of variation in the DFE at the species level, even among relatively closely related species. However, we find very little difference at the population level, suggesting that differences in the DFE are primarily driven by deep features of species biology, and those evolutionarily recent events, such as demographic changes and local adaptation, have little impact.
Authors
Anita SønstebyAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Raúl Ochoa-Hueso Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo Anita C. Risch Louise Ashton David Augustine Nicolas Bélanger Scott Bridgham Andrea J. Britton Viktor J. Bruckman J. Julio Camarero Gerard Cornelissen John A. Crawford Feike A. Dijkstra Amanda Diochon Stevan Earl James Edgerley Howard Epstein Andrew Felton Julien Fortier Daniel Gagnon Ken Greer Hannah M. Griffiths Caroline Halde Hans Martin Hanslin Lorna I. Harris Jeremy A. Hartsock Paul Hendrickson Knut Anders Hovstad Jia Hu Arun D. Jani Kelcy Kent Deirdre Kerdraon-Byrne Sat Darshan S. Khalsa Derrick Y. F. Lai France Lambert Jalene M. LaMontagne Stéphanie Lavergne Beth A. Lawrence Kim Littke Abigail C. Leeper Mark A. Licht Mark A. Liebig Joshua Lynn Janet E. Maclean Vegard Martinsen Marshall D. McDaniel Anne C. S. McIntosh Jessica R. Miesel Jim Miller Michael J. Mulvaney Gerardo Moreno Laura Newstead Robin J. Pakeman Jan Pergl Bradley D. Pinno Juan Piñeiro Kathleen Quigley Troy M. Radtke Paul Reed Víctor Rolo Jennifer Rudgers P. Michael Rutherford Emma J. Sayer Lilia Serrano-Grijalva Maria Strack Nicole Sukdeo Andy F. S. Taylor Benoit Truax Leonard J. S. Tsuji Natasja van Gestel Brenda M. Vaness Kevin Van Sundert Michaela Vítková Robert Weigel Meaghan J. Wilton Yuriko Yano Ewing Teen Eric BremerAbstract
Understanding the chemical composition of our planet's crust was one of the biggest questions of the 20th century. More than 100 years later, we are still far from understanding the global patterns in the bioavailability and spatial coupling of elements in topsoils worldwide, despite their importance for the productivity and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we measured the bioavailability and coupling of thirteen macro- and micronutrients and phytotoxic elements in topsoils (3–8 cm) from a range of terrestrial ecosystems across all continents (∼10,000 observations) and in response to global change manipulations (∼5,000 observations). For this, we incubated between 1 and 4 pairs of anionic and cationic exchange membranes per site for a mean period of 53 days. The most bioavailable elements (Ca, Mg, and K) were also amongst the most abundant in the crust. Patterns of bioavailability were biome-dependent and controlled by soil properties such as pH, organic matter content and texture, plant cover, and climate. However, global change simulations resulted in important alterations in the bioavailability of elements. Elements were highly coupled, and coupling was predictable by the atomic properties of elements, particularly mass, mass to charge ratio, and second ionization energy. Deviations from the predictable coupling-atomic mass relationship were attributed to global change and agriculture. Our work illustrates the tight links between the bioavailability and coupling of topsoil elements and environmental context, human activities, and atomic properties of elements, thus deeply enhancing our integrated understanding of the biogeochemical connections that underlie the productivity and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world.
Authors
Kjersti Holt Hanssen Viktor J. Bruckman Michael Gundale Aigars Indriksons Morten Ingerslev Marju Kaivapalu Dagnija Lazdina Kristaps Makovskis Adam O’Toole Katri Ots Marjo Palviainen Jogeir N. Stokland Iveta Varnagiryte-KabasinskieneAbstract
This report summarizes the status of biochar in forestry in the Nordic-Baltic countries today. Biochar is charred material formed by pyrolysis of organic materials. In addition to improving soil physical and chemical properties and plant growth, biochar is a promising negative emission technology for storing carbon (C) in soils. The report gives an overview of current and potential uses, production methods and facilities, legislation, current and future research as well as biochar properties and effects. Forests are both a source of feedstock for biochar production and a potential beneficiary for biochar use. Production is still limited in the Nordic-Baltic countries, but commercial production is on the rise and several enterprises are in the planning or start-up phase. In this report different biochar production technologies are described. As the (modern) use of biochar for agricultural and especially forestry purposes is relatively new, in many countries there are no specific legislation regulating its use. Sometimes the use of biochar is regulated through more general laws and regulations on e.g. fertilizers or soil amendment. However, both inside and outside EU several documents and standards exist, listing recommended physical and chemical limit values for biochar. So far, most biochar studies have been conducted on agricultural soils, though research in the forestry sector is starting to emerge. The first biochar field experiments in boreal forests support that wood biochar promotes tree growth. Also, studies on the use of biochar as an additive to the growing medium in tree nurseries show promising results. Because biochar C content is high, it is recalcitrant to decomposition, and application rates to soil can be high, biochar is a promising tool to enhance the C sequestration in boreal forests. However, available biomass and production costs may be barriers for the climate change mitigation potential of biochar. When it comes to effects on biodiversity, few field-based studies have been carried out. Some studies from the Nordic region show that biochar addition may affect microbial soil communities and vegetation, at least on a short time scale. There is clearly a need for more research on the effects of biochar in forestry in the Nordic-Baltic region. Long-term effects of biochar on e.g., forest growth, biodiversity, soil carbon and climate change mitigation potential should be studied in existing and new field experiments.
Abstract
Biochar, derived from organic waste via pyrolysis, is proposed as a soil amendment in the early twenty-first century. In this chapter, we summarize the great potential of pure biochar application in food production, soil fertility improvement, plant disease suppression, climate change mitigation, and heavy metal contamination control, based on field experiments globally. However, large-scale pure biochar implementation is restricted by high cost in terms of high price and application rate. The difficulty of biochar application using machines further reduces the farmers’ willingness to use biochar. Based on the experience of biochar usage in China, we propose a framework for large-scale implementation of industrialized biochar. Biochar can be developed into three products including liquid fertilizer, biochar-based organic fertilizer, and inorganic fertilizer. The soluble components in biochar after water extraction or in the wood vinegar during biochar production can be used to develop liquid fertilizer and used in fruit and vegetable growing. For fertile soils, biochar-based inorganic fertilizer is recommended for use instead of pure biochar. For degraded soils, biochar-based organic fertilizer is recommended to improve soil structure and provide nutrients for crops. Pure biochar is recommended to apply to heavy metal contaminated soil to decrease their uptake by crops.
Authors
Monica Ubalde-Lopez Mark Nieuwenhuijsen Giuseppina Spano Giovanni Sanesi Carlo Calfapietra Alice Meyer-Grandbastien Liz O’Brien Giovanna Ottaviani Aalmo Fabio Salbitano Jerylee Wilkes-Allemann Payam DadvandAbstract
The mainstream public health community often treats the natural environment with ambivalence. On one side, there are infectious agents, extreme weather, and catastrophic events such as floods, landslides, wildfires, storms, and earthquakes that directly or indirectly sicken, injure, or kill people (Hartig et al. 2014). On the other hand, human health is positively connected with the characteristics and quality of nature near to where people live. This ambivalence becomes crucial in cities where the living environment has peculiar characteristics both for humans and other living organisms. Indeed, there are many ways in which the urban environment can affect human health, positively or negatively. BioCities develop as dynamic socio-ecological systems hosted by nature. Therefore, addressing the issue of health according to an integrated and holistic approach, which reduces the negative effects of the natural environment and optimises its positive aspects, is a primary pillar in the construction of BioCities.