Publications
NIBIOs employees contribute to several hundred scientific articles and research reports every year. You can browse or search in our collection which contains references and links to these publications as well as other research and dissemination activities. The collection is continously updated with new and historical material.
2023
Authors
Natthidech Beesa Buncha Chinnasri Anongnuch Sasnarukkit Tida Dethoup Kansiree Jindapunnapat Agnes W. Kiriga Kanan Saikai Solveig Haukeland Danny CoyneAbstract
The legume cavalcade, Centrosema pascuorum, is used extensively as a cover crop and as a component of conservation agriculture systems. It is also an attractive rotation or cover crop for the management of root-knot nematodes (RKN; Meloidogyne spp.) as it is a non-host. RKN are persistent pests that are well known to be difficult to control. However, the mechanisms governing the non-host status of cavalcade is unknown. The current study established that cavalcade leaves are toxic to RKN as either aqueous extracts or soil amendments. Bioassays conducted using Meloidogyne javanica showed that a 90% concentration of aqueous extract derived from 1-month-old cavalcade leaves (89 mg crude extract ml−1) suppressed nematode hatch (82.9%) and killed infective second-stage juveniles of M. javanica (85.3%). Soil amendments with 1% (w/w) of 1-month-old cavalcade leaves (0.99 mg crude extract g−1 soil) also provided effective control of M. javanica in the glasshouse on okra. One-month-old leaves appeared more effective than 2- or 3-month-old leaves. The soil amendments had no adverse phytotoxic effect on okra seed germination. Our study demonstrates the potential for using cavalcade leaves or extracts to manage RKN. This may be due to the nematicidal activity of the various compounds in the leaves, such as flavonoids, phenols and terpenoids, which should be further assessed.
Authors
Taavi Riit Michelle Cleary Kalev Adamson Mimmi Blomquist Daiva Burokienė Diana Marčiulynienė Jonàs Oliva Anna Poimala Miguel Angel Redondo Gunn Strømeng Venche Talgø Leho Tedersoo Iben Margrete Thomsen Anne Uimari Johanna Witzell Rein DrenkhanAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Budiman Minasny Diana Vigah Adetsu Matt Aitkenhead Rebekka R. E. Artz Nikki Baggaley Alexandra Barthelmes Amélie Beucher Jean Caron Giulia Conchedda John Connolly Raphaël Deragon Chris Evans Kjetil Fadnes Dian Fiantis Zisis Gagkas Louis Gilet Alessandro Gimona Stephan Glatzel Mogens H. Greve Wahaj Habib Kristell Hergoualc’h Cecilie Hermansen Darren B. Kidd Triven Koganti Dianna Kopansky David J. Large Tuula Larmola Allan Lilly Haojie Liu Matthew Marcus Maarit Middleton Keith Morrison Rasmus Jes Petersen Tristan Quaife Line Rochefort NN Rudiyanto Linda Toca Francesco N. Tubiello Peter Lystbæk Weber Simon Weldon Wirastuti Widyatmanti Jenny Williamson Dominik ZakAbstract
Peatlands cover only 3–4% of the Earth’s surface, but they store nearly 30% of global soil carbon stock. This significant carbon store is under threat as peatlands continue to be degraded at alarming rates around the world. It has prompted countries worldwide to establish regulations to conserve and reduce emissions from this carbon rich ecosystem. For example, the EU has implemented new rules that mandate sustainable management of peatlands, critical to reaching the goal of carbon neutrality by 2050. However, a lack of information on the extent and condition of peatlands has hindered the development of national policies and restoration efforts. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge on mapping and monitoring peatlands from field sites to the globe and identifies areas where further research is needed. It presents an overview of the different methodologies used to map peatlands in nine countries, which vary in definition of peat soil and peatland, mapping coverage, and mapping detail. Whereas mapping peatlands across the world with only one approach is hardly possible, the paper highlights the need for more consistent approaches within regions having comparable peatland types and climates to inform their protection and urgent restoration. The review further summarises various approaches used for monitoring peatland conditions and functions. These include monitoring at the plot scale for degree of humification and stoichiometric ratio, and proximal sensing such as gamma radiometrics and electromagnetic induction at the field to landscape scale for mapping peat thickness and identifying hotspots for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Remote sensing techniques with passive and active sensors at regional to national scale can help in monitoring subsidence rate, water table, peat moisture, landslides, and GHG emissions. Although the use of water table depth as a proxy for interannual GHG emissions from peatlands has been well established, there is no single remote sensing method or data product yet that has been verified beyond local or regional scales. Broader land-use change and fire monitoring at a global scale may further assist national GHG inventory reporting. Monitoring of peatland conditions to evaluate the success of individual restoration schemes still requires field work to assess local proxies combined with remote sensing and modeling. Long-term monitoring is necessary to draw valid conclusions on revegetation outcomes and associated GHG emissions in rewetted peatlands, as their dynamics are not fully understood at the site level. Monitoring vegetation development and hydrology of restored peatlands is needed as a proxy to assess the return of water and changes in nutrient cycling and biodiversity.
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Unni Støbet LandeAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Authors
Lampros LamprinakisAbstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered
Abstract
No abstract has been registered